Bonding Warehouse plans revealed

Bonding warehouse

Bonding warehouse

The Bonding Warehouse may be turned into a restaurant and/or offices with the upper floors becoming 4 apartments.

A planning application, being considered on 4th July, also includes the erection of an “external access tower and bridge link to Skeldergate” as well as a new “mansard” roof to the southern part of the building

Details of the proposal – which is recommended for approval – can be found by clicking here

The building has been empty since 2000. In spite of the implementation of a “tanking” scheme inside the ground floor of the building to minimize the impact of flooding, the building is deteriorating and is highlighted as being “at risk” in the Central Historic Core conservation area appraisal.

Latest planning application Dringhouses and Woodthorpe area

Below is the latest planning application received by the York Council last week affecting the Dringhouses and Woodthorpe parts of the City. Full details can be found by quoting the application reference on the “planning portal” web site.

Representations can be made in favour of, or in objection to, any application via the Planning on line web site.

NB. The Council now no longer routinely consults neighbours by letter when an application is received.

Location: 33 Moorcroft Road York YO24 2RQ Ref No: 13/01971/FUL Proposal: Sub-division of dwelling to form 2no. self-contained flats and dormer to front (resubmission) Applicant: Mr Andrew Henderson Contact Mr Andrew Henderson Consultation Expiry Date 16 July 2013 Case Officer: Elizabeth Potter Expected Decision Level DEL

York Green Belt IS protected

As Labour become ever more desperate in their attempts to justify their “high growth” Local Plan, one mantra that keeps being repeated in that York “doesn’t have a Green Belt”.

In fact, York has had a (draft) Green belt for several decades. There are many planning decisions (important precedents) which revolved around development being refused because of its effect on the Green Belt.

The Green Belt received regional recognition – and protection – in the “Yorkshire and Humber Regional Spatial Strategy” (RSS) which was adopted in 2007.

Although the RSS was overtaken by the Localism Act (the present governments attempt to give more power to local communities), the York Green Belt boundaries were quite specifically recognised and protected when the new legislation was enacted.

Details can be found on this Government web site
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/117/note/made</a>

The government’s explanatory note reads,

Section 109 of the Localism Act 2011(1) abolished the regional planning tier by repealing Part 5 of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009(2) (which only applied in relation to England). This includes the removal of the responsible regional authorities. Section 109 also made provision to revoke or partially revoke, by order, the eight existing regional strategies.

This Order makes use of those powers to partially revoke the regional strategy for Yorkshire and Humber, which comprises The Yorkshire and Humber Plan Regional Spatial Strategy to 2026 (“the RSS”) and the Regional Economic Strategy for Yorkshire & Humber 2006-2015. Policies in the RSS which relate to the Green Belt around the City of York are retained. The Key Diagram from the RSS is retained insofar as it illustrates the retained York Green Belt policies and the general extent of the Green Belt around the City of York. The Key Diagram can be found after page 214 of the RSS. A copy can be obtained from the Planning Directorate, Department for Communities and Local Government, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London, SW1E 5DU

So unless and until it is changed the Green Belt around York remains protected.

Existing York Green Belt boundaries. click to enlarge

Existing York Green Belt boundaries. click to enlarge

The protected (draft) Green Belt boundaries are the same as those that Labour Councillors (and others) voted in favour of in the summer of 2011 (see map left)..

The word “draft” only disappears from the description of the York Green Belt when a Public Inquiry has been held and a government Minister has approved a new Local Plan.

In 2012 Labour withdrew the proposed Local Plan from the Public inquiry after doubts were raised about the credibility of the policies contained in it regarding out of City centre shopping facilities (post the Monks Cross planning decision).

The existing Green Belt boundaries continue to be protected.

Labour should stop trying to frighten residents into thinking otherwise.

York residents asked to monitor wildlife in their garden. Newts blamed for inconvenience.

A new report has been published this month which looks into “what we all can do to ensure that York’s habitat and wildlife, including endangered species, are protected from extinction”.

Newts at Monks Cross

The York Council says, “Residents can help by completing fact sheets about wildlife activity in their gardens at www.york.gov.uk/localplan– in the ‘download documents panel’.

You’ll be hard pressed thought to find a form see here Clearly, after recent events, spotting Great Crested Newts these days earns rather fewer ISpy points than might have been the case a couple of decades ago.

(more…)

Save the Green Belt update

• Petition signatures top 1200

• Chapelfields residents meeting tomorrow Wednesday at Sanderson House, 7:00pm

• “Drop in” session at Acomb Library on Thursday (2:30pm to 7:00pm)

Pressure is growing on Labour Councillors to attend a public meeting and defend their plan to increase the City’s population by 40,000 (25%).

The call came after Labour delivered a highly misleading leaflet/survey form to some residents over the weekend in which they implied that the 22,000 new homes were required for people already living in the City.

Labour Green Belt Leafelt00003The survey asks only 3 questions.

1. How important is it to build new homes? All parties agree that there is a need for an increase in the number of homes in the City. It would require around 400 additional homes just to cater for local needs (new families forming while increasing life expectancy means existing homes remain occupied). The issue is how many homes are needed, where and when? (Labour plan 1090 homes per year, mostly on land which is currently in the Green Belt).

2. They ask how important the Greenfield setting of the City is (The Green Belt issue)? Most will say that it is important. Many respondents will think that they are endorsing the existing Green Belt boundaries (these are protected by regional policies and will continue to be unless, and until, the Council gets revised boundaries approved at a Public Inquiry)

3. Having softened people up, Labour then ask whether residents support their Local Plan proposals? The overwhelming evidence so far is that most residents do not support increasing the size of the City by 25%. Many are horrified at those parts of the Plan which would lead to the destruction of its Greenfield setting. Some will also be sceptical about the assumptions made about economic growth. 1000 additional jobs per year is a figure that is unlikely to be achieved consistently over a long period, while lack of an affordable transport and public service improvement policy, may be the final nail in the coffin of the high growth option favoured by Labour.

In reality the Councils own papers admit that the majority of occupants of the new homes will be economic migrants from other countries. Around 700 (2/3) of the new homes would be occupied by migrants each year.

Page 14 of the ARUP report says, “Population growth in York between 2010 and 2030 is ultimately driven by the scale of international migration into the authority

That is not to say that immigration is a bad thing in principle. Migrants sometimes take on jobs that local residents, for one reason or another, shun. New blood can with bring with it innovation, motivation and fresh thinking.

But it is the unprecedented size, and timescale, of the population change that threatens York’s unique character.

It is not surprising then that residents are demanding that a public meeting takes place at which Labour Councillors can be challenged on some of their more obviously bogus claims.

In the meantime, residents are reminded of the importance of registering individual objections to the published proposals. This can be done by emailing localplan@york.gov.uk (website – www.york.gov.uk/localplan)

Comments can be made – and larger scale maps viewed – at the Acomb Explore Library on Front Street this Thursday 20th June between 2:30pm and 7:00pm. We understand that some “pro Green Belt” residents will be lobbying this “drop in” session.

Please let us know if you require additional petition forms and/or copies of the window poster (as below)

Green Belt campaign logo

Latest Planning applications for Dringhouses and Woodthorpe plus details of Beckfield Lane recycling centre redevelopment

Below is the latest planning application received by the York Council last week. Full details can be found by quoting the application reference on the “planning portal” web site. Click here.

Representations can be made in favour of, or in objection to, any application via the Planning on line web site.

NB. The York Council now no longer routinely consults neighbours by letter when an application is received.

Location: Cross Keys Public House 32 Tadcaster Road Dringhouses York YO24 1LQ Ref No: 13/01479/ADV Proposal: Display of 1no. illuminated hanging sign, 1no. non-illuminated hanging sign, 1no. externally illuminated fascia sign, 1no. non-illuminated amenity sign and 2no. lanterns Applicant: Mr Tim Wass Contact Mr Leslie Gregg Consultation Expiry Date 8 July 2013 Case Officer: Carolyn Howarth Expected Decision Level

Location: Cross Keys Public House 32 Tadcaster Road Dringhouses York YO24 1LQ Ref No: 13/01480/LBC Proposal: Replacement signs and 2no. lanterns to entrance Applicant: Mr Tim Wass Contact Mr Leslie Gregg Consultation Expiry Date 17 July 2013 Case Officer: Carolyn Howarth Expected Decision Level DEL

Location: 7 Slingsby Grove York YO24 1LS Ref No: 13/01577/FUL Proposal: Two storey side extension Applicant: Mr Andrew Thurman Consultation Expiry Date 8 July 2013 Case Officer: Elizabeth Potter Expected Decision Level DEL

Location: 51 Principal Rise Dringhouses York YO24 1UF Ref No: 13/01225/FUL Proposal: Conversion of garage to habitable room Applicant: Mrs Elisabeth Butterworth Consultation Expiry Date 8 July 2013 Case Officer: Elizabeth Potter Expected Decision Level DEL

Location: 6 Nidd Grove York YO24 2PZ Ref No: 13/01771/FUL Proposal: Single storey extension to rear and porch to front Applicant: Mr Simon Bays Contact John Dougal Consultation Expiry Date 8 July 2013 Case Officer: Elizabeth Potter Expected Decision Level DEL

Acomb Ward

Location: Former Civic Amenity Site Beckfield Lane York Ref No: 13/01833/FULM Proposal: Erection of 19no. dwellinghouses and 9no. apartments with associated works following demolition of existing buildings Applicant: City Of York Council Contact: Mr Jordan Gill Consultation Expiry Date: 17 July 2013Case Officer: Victoria Bell Expected Decision Level: COMM

NB A large number of objections to this plan are expected. In the main the grounds of objection are likely to be that the Council has failed to provide an adequate alternative method which allows residents to dispose of bulky items in an environmentally friendly, and convenient, way

Bonding Warehouse media centre plan abandoned

Bonding Warehouse

Bonding Warehouse

Media reports suggest that the Bonding warehouse is no longer being considered as a possible “media and creative centre”.

Taxpayers will be relieved.

Many residents were aghast last year when the flood prone building was put on a shortlist for the project.

It had been sold by the Council at the height of the property boom 5 years ago but had failed to find a new use. Access during high water levels in the Ouse makes the building inaccessible in its present form.

In total around £3.6 million of taxpayers’ money was earmarked for the project. No convincing business plan has yet been published with earlier estimates suggesting that the private sector would contribute only around 20% of the investment costs.

In the autumn even Labour Councillors began to challenge the wisdom of the project.

It was revealed that taxpayers had already footed a £25,000 bill for the – now abandoned – Bonding Warehouse project.

It seems that the focus of attention for this project is now switching to the Guildhall which has been empty now for 3 months.

There is likely to be more widespread support for the use of the modern office next at the Guildhall as some sort of business centre. Whether the financial figures can be made to stack up remains to be seen.

If the Council is now beginning to jettison some of its more harebrained schemes then they could look again at their proposed £100,000 investment in an “Arts Barge”.

We remain sceptical about the need for any additional arts venue in the City, but it would be better to site any such facility on dry land. The Guildhall might just allow 2 birds to be killed with one stone …. But taxpayers will want to see more convincing evidence that the projects can be self funding.

NB. The owners of the Bonding Warehouse are understood to be pursuing its possible use as a restaurant, offices and flats.

York residents consultation overload?

York-street-sign-great-britain-798670_305_200

After 2 years with virtually no consultation with residents, York is heading towards an overdose this month.

The latest is asking about how the City centre should look and be preserved.

Other consultations taking place at present include:

20 mph city wide speed limit. Deadline for receipt of objections 21st June 2013 www.york20mph.org Alternative view

Local Plan & the Green Belt — Deadline 31st July. www.york.gov.uk/local plan Alternative view

New ward boundaries (Boundary Commission). Deadline 5th August http://tinyurl.com/Wards-June-2013 Alternative view:

The new consultation talks about the importance of having a “fully accessible” City. The consultation runs for eight-weeks until Wednesday 31 July.

(more…)

York Local Plan documents finally published.

Immigration forecasts click to enlarge

Immigration forecasts click to enlarge

It’s not difficult to see why the York Council was so reluctant to publish the ARUP report on housing needs in the City.

The report is now available click here and confirms that most of the new homes would be occupied by “international migrants

The background documents that the Council is relying on to justify providing 22,000 additional homes – many in the green belt – have now all been published (http://www.york.gov.uk/downloads/200396/planning_policy).

In February 2011 the Council agreed a plan which would have seen around 600 additional homes built in York each year. These would have been built on brownfield (previously developed) land such as unused sites previously occupied by British Sugar, Nestle, Terry’s and the railways (York Central).

When Labour won the 2011 local elections they increased this build figure to 800 p.a. before submitting their proposal to central government. That plan also confirmed the draft Green Belt boundaries which had been drawn up more than a decade previously.

Population Growth click to enlarge

Population Growth click to enlarge

In April of this year the Labour Cabinet relied on a secret report by Consultants ARUP to justify an increased target of at least 1200 new homes each year for the next 15 years.

The published report has obviously been re-written for public consumption as it has an edition date of 15th May – long after the Cabinet decision meeting which took place on 30th April 2013.

The report says that in 2011 York had a population of 198,000 people. This represents an increase of almost 17,000 people or 9.3% in the number of people living within the authority area since the 2001 Census.

Housing completions click to enlarge

Housing completions click to enlarge

It goes on to confirm that the, long term average for housing completions in the authority for the period 2004/05(the start of the RSS plan period) – 2011/12 was 648 net additional dwellings.

The report says that to accommodate “natural” change (excluding inward migration) no more than 400 additional homes would be required each year (686 people)

The report confirms (page13) that most of the new houses above that figures will be occupied by immigrants “Cumulatively, this is based on a growth of 36,000 international migrants in the authority within this time period”

It is this that generates a “demand” for 1310 new home per year.

It is then suggested by the report authors that these projections should be reduced to reflect local evidence. They suggest 850 dwelling per year to be more appropriate (which would still imply that 16,000 immigrants would join the York community over the next 15 years).

The independent Office of National Statistics forecast (page 14) a population growth of 1176 pa (600 dwellings), while a later 2011 based study forecasts 700 dwellings.

The York community has benefited from inward migration over the centuries. Immigrants often provide the labour and ideas to move communities forward. However, no City of York’s size would have tried to accommodate such a major population change in such a short space of time.

The consultants conclude on page 18 “As such we believe that such a figure (850 dwellings per year) is in line with the most recent evidence on demographic trends, and in particular levels of migration. We therefore believe that adopting such an approach would mean that the area is meeting objectively assessed needs”.

Job growth click to enlarge

Job growth click to enlarge

ARUP conclude that we are likely to see a growth in jobs of between 800 and 960 jobs per annum over the next 15 years.

A higher growth rate has been assumed by the Council’s Cabinet in certain job sectors such as finance and tourism.

It is this that leads to the claim that at least 1090 new homes per annum are required.
(more…)

List of Dringhouses Ward planning applications received last week

Below is the latest planning application received by the York Council. Full details can be found by clicking by quoting the application reference on the “planning portal” web site. Click here. http://planningaccess.york.gov.uk/online-applications/

Representations can be made in favour of, or in objection to, any application via the Planning on line web site.

NB. The Council now no longer routinely consults neighbours by letter when an application is received.

Ref No: 13/01311/FUL Location: 30 White House Drive York YO24 1ED Proposal: Two storey side and rear extension Applicant: Ms Shelley King Contact Mr Bob Marks Consultation Expiry Date 24 June 2013 Case Officer: Elizabeth Potter Expected Decision Level DEL